The scientific search for nephite remains mormons in. Book of mormon archaeology has long been a favorite interest of. Within the past several decades, professional studies in american archaeology, geography, culture, and language have provided an enormous amount of information of great interest to readers and believers of the book of mormon. Book of mormon evidence in american archaeology wayne may.
Why does the book of mormon mention wine, vineyards, and winepresses. Rlds view on the discovery of barley and future book of. There is no archaeological evidence of the jaredite people described in the book of mormon that is accepted by mainstream archaeologists. Videos watch past wayne may presentations as he reveals the supporting evidences of the book of mormon as found in archaeology, geography and historical records.
Archaeological trends and the book of mormon origins byu studies. Videos you watch may be added to the tvs watch history and influence tv recommendations. Use this book as your guide to the remarkable similarities between ancient mesoamericans, and the peoples of the book of mormon. The factitious unsupported idea that joseph suffered from a mental illness.
Does the book of mormon have archaeology to back up any of. That joseph smith and successive generations of mormon presidents and apostles taught that the nephites and lamanites ranged over all or most of south and north america and fought a battle to. The book of mormon describes migrations of people from the middle east to central america, and further describes some features of their civilizations in the new world. This compilation of groundbreaking book of mormon articles is selected from over fifty years of lds scholarship published by byu studies. The mayan gods gathered under the tree of life to hold a council all the gods had taken part in the creation of the earth. The overall trend in the date over the past 175 years fits the expectations for the book of mormon as history rather than hoax. Archaeological trends and the book of mormon origins byu. Not only have cement structures been identified throughout mesoamerica, but as dr. Wayne may, author and publisher of ancient american magazine now in its 25th year of print, continues to fill its pages with new and past discoveries in the americas. Supporting evidences of the book of mormon are broadly identifiable. When they say directly support, they typically mean that they are looking for a direct corroboration, such as the presence of the name nephi or zarahemla in association with.
Dec 12, 2007 the lay mormon is told by the mormon church that archaeology continues to confirm the book of mormon, while mormon scholars, who actually study archaeology for a living, have something quite. This changed by the time joseph fielding smith, the future president of the. Archaeology is in fact, physical evidence that supports the truthfulness of a historical event. These traditions truly conflict with the book of mormon, the word of god, so the heartland model can be. Im going to first answer the question, and then explain my answer and offer background. We are excited to introduce temporary complimentary access to our archive of over 70 years of archaeology magazine and to bring a world of discovery to your home. Oct 25, 2008 it appears that the book of mormon had no place in the new world whatsoever. Nevertheless, some mormon scholars believe that the jaredites were the olmec civilization, though archaeological evidence supporting this theory is disputed and circumstantial.
Foundation for ancient research and mormon studies, 1985, p. Book of mormon claims remain unaltered since 1830, so all the accommodation has been on the archaeology side. Serious study of the book of mormon by latterday saints is flourishing today as. Have the valley of lemuel and the river laman been found. Other people can use the explanation to justify that their religion hasnt been 100% disproved by evidence even if the explanation is somewhat weak in places. Oct 24, 2014 the book of mormon and archaeology by dr.
This article answers the claim that the book of mormon figure called sherem is an example of a nonisraelite. Archaeological and historical evidence evidences of the. This volume features articles on archaeological and anthropological aspects of the book of mormon, such as the use of the wheel in ancient america, hagoth and the polynesian tradition, the mulekites, ancient writing in the americas, and the use of metal. When confronted with the book, most people reject it because of its cover story. Oct 07, 2012 read a transcript of this lecture here. The book of mormon was written for the purpose of convincing those who are sincere abou.
It seems that book of mormon archaeology has shifted away from looking for the big discovery and towards building a nonfalsifiable explanation for the book of mormon peoples existence. Watch wayne mays past presentations about american archaeology and its parallels to the book of mormon civilizations. Book 1 of 3 in the archaeology and the book of mormon series. Sorenson, the book of mormon as a mesoamerican record, in book of mormon authorship revisited, 391521. What does archaeology reveal about warfare during early nephite times.
The factitious unsupported idea that someone else wrote the book of mormon. The book of mormon teaches that the redemption of christ was planned before the world began, and the mayans likewise believed in gods who. Archaeology and the book of mormon hardcover january 1, 1956 by milton r hunter author 5. Hagoth hagoth is reported to have built ships and sent explorers northward from a spot on the coast of the west sea by the narrow neck of land see alma 63. Actually there is lots of evidence for joseph smiths book of mormon archaeology. Hunter of the first council of the seventy is a book of tremendous interest and value for those who would know firsthand the traditions and folkways of the early inhabitants of north, central, and south america as well as know the truth contained in the book of mormon concerning these peoples. If the book of mormon is really true history, then even after 1500 years, there should be some evidence that would support the truthfulness of those historical scriptural events, as recorded in the book of mormon. Why was coriantumrs record engraved on a large stone. At least they are not wed in reality since no book of mormon location is known with reference to modern topography. Apr 28, 2017 it seems that book of mormon archaeology has shifted away from looking for the big discovery and towards building a nonfalsifiable explanation for the book of mormon peoples existence. The lay mormon is told by the mormon church that archaeology continues to confirm the book of mormon, while mormon scholars, who actually study archaeology for a. Nonmormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. If the book were fiction, this convergence would not be happening. The factitious unsupported idea that the book of mormon was plagiarized from other books.
The first myth that we need to eliminate is that book of mormon archaeology exists. It seems misplaced endnote 20, continuing from endnote 19 in part 2. Five that some mormons occasionally cite as archaeological evidence for the. October 1st is the anniversary of a little known event in early church history that i believe, in consequence of significant research progress, now deserves recognition for identifying a region of major book of mormon lands and for initiating book of mormon archaeological historicity research. Archaeological science versus claims of the book of mormon. Michael coe an outsiders view of book of mormon archaeology. One of the most competent and helpful evaluations of book of mormon archaeology is a paper delivered by brigham young university archaeology professor raymond t. The thriving beyond orthodox mormonism project is an effort to provide tips, tricks, inspiration, and hope to those who are questioning, doubting, andor leaving orthodox mormonism through sharing profiles of thriving postmormons and progressive mormons. Aug 01, 2007 use this book as your guide to the remarkable similarities between ancient mesoamericans, and the peoples of the book of mormon. For reasons i understand, this is a frequently asked question. The book of mormon is really there so one can have book of mormon studies, and archaeology is really there so one can study archaeology, but the two are not wed. Non mormon archaeologists speak on book of mormon evidence. In fact, several mormon organizations have been founded in order to prove.
The book of mormon describes three migrations of people from the middle east to america. The trend over the last 50 years is one of convergence between the book of mormon and mesoamerican archaeology. The book of mormon suggests that the original native americans descended from a small band of israelites. Since the publication of the book of mormon in 1830, mormon archaeologists have attempted to find archaeological evidence to support it. Mormon traditions would have us believe that the book of mormon took place in the heartland and in new york. Preearth life similar to mormon teachings, mesoamericans believed gods existed before the world was created. Welch pointed out that no archeologist in 1829 could have known how accurately the dating of this technological adaptation correlated with what was happening on the ground. There is absolutely no archaeological evidence to directly support the book of mormon or the nephites and lamanites, who were supposed to have numbered in the millions. But the book of mormon never mentions any other nations. We are not about to uncover the a sign tomorrow or the next day or a year or ten. In the last chapter we saw that the bible is reliable, being textually pure and verifiably accurate in many places. If the book is accurate, archaeologists would expect to find numerous pieces of hard evidence in central america that confirm the presence of these societies. At least a modest crowd will appear any time a lecture is announced with both terms in the title.
The factitious unsupported idea that joseph smith was a creative genius who, wrote the book. The factitious unsupported idea that joseph smith, alleged to be an ignorant man, wrote the book of mormon 2. Next, we come to book of mormon archaeology, which i would define as an attempt by mormons to establish the historicity of the book of mormon by means of dirt archaeology, or by analysis of archaeological findings made by nonmormons. It is a common claim by critics that there is absolutely no archaeological evidence to support the book of mormon. The book of mormon from the church of jesus christ of latter day saints mormons to you and i have a doozy of story told by joseph smith that most people arent even aware of. Archaeological proof of the book of mormon lds blogs. Book of mormon references are from the rlds version. See all formats and editions hide other formats and editions. Biblical archaeology can be studied because we do know where. Archaeology, relics, and book of mormon belief book of. The critics would have us believe that there is little if any differ ence between biblical archaeology and book of mormon ar chaeology. Is there archaeological evidence for the book of mormon. How a mormon lawyer transformed archaeology in mexicoand ended up losing his faith duration. They frequently claim that because certain aspects of the bible have been verified by archaeological evidence, that the book of mormon must have the same verifiable support from new world archaeology.
As seen by science, the book of mormon is stronger today than it was in 1830, 1844, 1950, or even 2000, so i expect it will continue to become stronger in the future. Jan 01, 2008 the journal of book of mormon studies is a scholarly journal devoted to the latest research on the book of mormon, including articles on the geography, names, terms, and events in the book of mormon, as well as archaeological finds in the old world and the new world. T he book of mormon is advertized by the church of jesus christ of latterday saints as another testament of jesus christ and specifically of the account of his supposed visit to the american continent the book of mormon, 3 nephi 11. To avoid this, cancel and sign in to youtube on your computer. Smithsonian archaeologists see no direct connection between the archaeology of the new world and the subject matter. The book of mormon has been discussed and dissected now for 175 years, but only during the last fifty has american archaeology been capable of addressing issues of history and generating reliable facts. Two of the most prevalent claims for the book of mormon are, there is much archaeological proof to the book of mormon, and the american indians are descendants of israelites who came to america as described in the book of mormon. John sorenson noted, the firstcenturybc appearance of cement in the book of mormon agrees strikingly with the archaeology of central mexico. Book of mormon archaeology has long been a favorite interest of latterday saints. Archaeology itself can be divided and subdivided into numerous disciplines. Watch presentations about american archaeology and its parallels to the book of mormon civilizations. For those of you who are newly questioningdoubting orthodox mormonism, we want you to know know that. In a times and seasons editorial, october 1, 1842, the prophet joseph smith, after progressive study. When they say directly support, they typically mean that they are looking for a direct corroboration, such as the presence of the name nephi or zarahemla in association with ancient american archaeological data.
It appears that the book of mormon had no place in the new world whatsoever. How a mormon lawyer transformed archaeology in mexicoand ended up losing his faith. Archaeology, relics, and book of mormon belief bmaf. The journal of book of mormon studies is a scholarly journal devoted to the latest research on the book of mormon, including articles on the geography, names, terms, and events in the book of mormon, as well as archaeological finds in the old world and the new world. Im not really interested in book of mormon archaeology. If the book of mormon is an authentic historical record of real people, language, and cultures, then we would expect to find tangible evidences that corroborate itunless of course it is a work of joseph smiths imagination. If playback doesnt begin shortly, try restarting your device. There is no archaeological evidence for the book of mormon.
Archaeology and geography support the book of mormon to the same degree. New evidence for the book of mormon name sariah 1 nephi 2. The three periods past, present, and future can perhaps best be characterized by three approaches to book of mormon archaeology. It just doesnt seem to fit anything in anthropology or history.
Book of mormon thought false by lds memberarchaelogist. Mcmurrin, a former latterday saint, said critically, you dont get books from angels and translate them 1 clark. Sorenson, an ancient american setting for the book of mormon, salt lake city. In the paper revisiting sariah at elephantine, neal rappleye, a research project manager here at book of mormon central, explains that scholars have identified a jewish woman named. Archeological trends and book of mormon origins published by byu scholarsarchive, 2005. Archaeology and the book of mormon lds critics frequently claim that while the bible has been proven to be accurate by the discoveries of archaeology, the book of mormon has no archaeological support. Watch book of mormon centrals new video on one of the best examples of archaeological evidence we have for the book of mormon. Book of mormon archaeology major anachronisms one of the most competent and helpful evaluations of book of mormon archaeology is a paper delivered by brigham young university archaeology professor raymond t. Archaeological and historical evidence where did the book. With new and exciting insights, pages full of thoughtful comparisons, and compelling illustrations, decoding ancient america will capture the interest of anyone curious about book of mormon archaeology. Archaeology research in precolumbian americas and the book of mormon.
John dehlin august 12, 2011 apologetics, best of mormon stories, book of mormon, johns favorites, top 10 truth claims, top 100 204 comments. We can break down this antimormon charge into three issues. However, there exists no credible archaeological evidence proving that the book of mormon is a record of literate ancient american people of hebrew descent. Book of mormon archaeology in the new world parent page. In this paper, i will marshal recent facts from archaeology to evaluate the trends in seeing the book of mormon as hoax or as history. Numerous observers have suggested that the book of mormon appears to be a work of fiction that parallels others within the 19thcentury moundbuilder genre that was pervasive at the time. The king james quotations in the book of mormon, the history of the text of the book of mormon. Therefore, the mormon can have confidence that the bible is the word of god and that it can be accurately translated. Mormon scholars argue that the book of mormon israelites who lived in the americas were assimilated into other nations. Archaeological and historical evidence where did the. Book of mormon archaeology and anthropology byu studies. If you missed the bmaf messages announcing the change please go to and enter your email address. Matheny at the 1984 sunstone theological symposium in salt lake city.
561 1338 300 956 1513 957 780 1151 1330 1123 986 1038 785 1048 480 1299 821 1551 716 1364 1435 1015 1222 1526 506 1101 1142 1160 1158 631 103 5 1020 218 315 1222 781